On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:35:29AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I think it is still there (and my draft copy says the same thing).
> : I was thinking about the original C89 standard which does not allow it
> : (and does not allow incomplete array types in structs). Guess I should
> : have said which standard I was referring to.
>
> struct foo {
> char array[0];
> };
>
> appears to be in C-99 but not C-89. If you have the draft, so far the
> only thing I've noticed that is different between the draft and the
> final standard is that there's 10-15 more footnotes in the final
> standard than were in the final draft.
>
> Warner
Are you sure that is in C99?
What is allowed in C99 (but wasn't in C89) is
struct foo
{
int b;
char array[];
};
Note that you must have a 'normal' field before the incomplete array.
I don't think
char array[0];
is allowed in either of C89 or C99.
--
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
