I think what I was trying to say is that a lot of C++ programmers will obfuscate their code by using features of the language that don't fit with what they were trying to accomplish.
Ken On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > I have a small problem. I work for software development company and > : > write daemons and console tools for Unix. My boss wants everything to be > : > written in C++, because he thinks C++ is cool. I prefer C for such > : > tasks, but I cannot really put good arguments of why and where C++ can > : > be worse than C. I know many of you prefer C too. Can you please explain > : > some disadvantages of C++ comparing to C ? Is it slower, does it produce > : > less effective code, why is it like that, etc ... or please direct me to > : > some articles where this can be explained. > : > : My main problem with C++ is that it adds a lot of overhead, and it's slow. > : Also, it drives me nuts when people code in C++ and write all kinds of > : classes when using classes for certain things just doesn't make sense, and > : makes the code much more convoluted. > > C++ doesn't add noticable overhead and isn't slow, unless you are a > dumbass about how you write it. All languages give you plenty of ways > to write speghetti fortran code :-). C++ gives you a number of ways > to obfuscate. > > Warner > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
