In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug White
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Mike: 'mired.org' has some bogus DNS entries floating around. Is it a new
> domain? I can't send mail to it since it has no records at all.
No, it's not a new domain. It's over two years old. I find entries for
it on servers that are totally unrelated to it:
guru% dig @ns.idiom.com mired.org
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @ns.idiom.com mired.org
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; mired.org, type = A, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
mired.org. 20M IN A 64.192.6.133
[Authority and additional sections deleted]
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
> > Yes, but when lib c depends on lib d, your script won't pick it up.
> > The patches to ldd will. They will recurse on down forever.
> I realize this is probably extremely rare, but does it catch circular
> dependencies? You don't want it looping off into forever.
It lists both libraries once, showing the dependencies between
them. When it finds a library, it adds it to the list if it isn't
already on it. It keeps listing what's in a library until all of them
are listed.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
