Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > The "winbindd" program is an NSS interfaced program; therefore it
> > should work *fine* in 5.x, since NSS supposedly works fine in 5.x.
> 
> Well, you were saying that DSOs were unsafe or some such, so I assumed
> that FreeBSD 5.x's NSS did not support DSOs, and thus windindd.

PAM uses it anyway.

I was making a point about intentional avoidance of IRS, and
that modules can't work in statically linked programs.


> I guess I should just try it.

THat's always the best.  8-).

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to