On Tuesday, 29 October 2002 at  2:03:50 +0000, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 01:54, Kenneth Culver wrote:
>>> I haven't had any trouble with the WDxxxBB drives - the WDxxxAA drives
>>> are pretty unreliable though.
>>>
>> Hrmm, I havn't tried those, but just about every WD drive I've used has
>> ended up with problems which were of course handled by the warranty, but
>> even then, I still had to reinstall the os and pull a bunch of stuff from
>> my backups which was a pain to do for each failure. Like I said, just my
>> personal experience. I don't think the new 8MB cache drives have been out
>> long enough to actually develop the problems I've seen on WD drives
>> though.
>
> Yes, but my point is that the AA drives are bad, but the BB drives seem
> good. I have been using them for a while (~1 year) without trouble.

I've had trouble with BB drives.  Given that they have (or had) a 3
year warranty, 1 year of experience isn't very much to go by.

> Personally I find that no HD manufacturer has a good reputation -
> they have all made trashy drives at one point. Give the general time
> it takes for problems to surface vs product lifetimes makes deciding
> what to buy a PITA :(

That's a more valid point.

Note that WD and Seagate have dropped their warranty on IDE drives
from 3 years to 1 year.  What does this say to you?

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to