:Matthew Dillon wrote:
:> The "vga" driver works in low resolution modes. The "vesa" driver
:> does not work. Via has a linux driver on their CD for X, called "via",
:> which linux people seem to be using successfully, but I can't find
:> sources anywhere. I don't understand why these companies don't just
:> include sources for their X drivers, it would make life so much easier.
:
:The do not because then people could leverage their work by
:building hardware which does not license anything from them,
:but operates compatably. The same reason Adaptec developed
:their "HIM" layer, to prevent people from using Adaptec SCSI
:drivers with non-Adaptec hardware, and getting all the work
:they did to get the driver into the Windows base OS, for free.
:
:Basically, it's done to amortize non-recurring non-developement
:related collateral business costs.
:
:Or, if you're Diamond, it's done because you hired an EE to
:do your firmware instead of a software engineer, and a third
:party driver could cause your hardware or an external monitor
:to explode. 8-).
:
:-- Terry
This doesn't make any sense to me. There are a huge number of
open-source drivers available, why would a third party want to
"steal" the hardware layer to VIA's hardware just to emulate it?
Why not some other hardware abstraction that is already available
in open-source form? From a business perspective I just don't
see how this could possibly effect VIA's bottom line. It isn't
rocket science we're talking about here, it's a sodding frame
buffer.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
