On 20 Jun, Andrey Alekseyev wrote: >> Eh, but the generation number for file1 should have been changed! This will > > I'm sorry, the generation number is not changed in your scenario. Thus, > I believe if the sequence of actions on the server is > > mv file1 tmpfile > mv file2 file1 > mv tmpfile file1 > > like you described, it's safe to continue to use a cached file handle > for file1 on the server since it still references the original file. > And file2 just disappears from the server.
Well just its contents ... but this still violates POLA. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
