Given that uma_zalloc() has the same flags as malloc(9) shouldn't it check these flags like malloc(9) does? I would think we could copy the #ifdef INVARIANTS section at the beginning of malloc(9) to uma_zalloc_arg().
I just found a large number of calls in the ATM code that have just M_ZERO or even 0 flags. Anything against this check? harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
