On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 09:59:18AM +0100 I heard the voice of
David Malone, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> A significant number of these are ad servers, so after complaining
> to Doubleclick and getting no response, I've told my local name
> server that it is authorititive for doubleclick.net and given it
> an empty zone. Since doing this I don't notice the problem any more.
I short-circuited to hosts and ipfw.
# ipfw show 2
00002 14 864 reject ip from any to 127.0.0.2
# telnet ad.doubleclick.net 80
Trying 127.0.0.2...
telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.2: Permission denied
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host
('course, DNS is better with multiple machines. You could just burn a
single RFC1918 address for rejecting all the ad-type things)
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
"The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I
haven't figured out how to light the middle yet"
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
