In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes : >I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the >device_t parent to nexus_pcib_is_host_bridge (in STABLE) as Bernd says. >I traced the boot on my system and the MMCR is initialised early (when >the Timecounter "ELAN" output occurs). Immediately following that >initialisation, 'pcib' is added as a child of 'nexus'. I don't see why >'mmcr' couldn't be added as a child of 'nexus' too. At this point, >nexus isn't walking through it's children so there shouldn't be a problem. >Then the ELAN specific devices (like GPIO and flash) can attach to 'mmcr'. > >This seems straight forward. Maybe I'm missing something. 8-)
That's my take too. And MMCR belongs on nexus not on legacy from an architectural point of view. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
