On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:17:13PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > : > In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said: > : > > buf.c_iflag |= IGNBRK; > : > > buf.c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE | PARODD); > : > > buf.c_cflag |= CS8 | CLOCAL | PARENB; > : > > : > Do you maybe want CS7 here? > : > : No I need 8e1, but the output still looks like 8n1. > > 8e1? You want 8 data bits plus a nineth parity bit?
Exactly - 11 bit-times per dataword. But the problem is already identified and was not on the FreeBSD side as I wrote in another mail. Now I'm worried with the sending timing - maybe I should switch to uftdi based serials, because they have large fifos and also have a transmitter enable output for half-duplex operation. Currently I handle transmitter enabling via RTS line from userland, which leaves a potential for not having the transmitter disabled when the accessed slave answers. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
