On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:22:14AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Hmm, ok ;-) But then why is _thread_kern_sig_undefer() called within > > every if-case, instead of just below the if ? It looked like it was > > contructed this way to be able to omit _thread_kern_sig_undefer() in > > that specific case... ;-) > > Look at revision 1.16 of uthread_join. Revision 1.17 removed the > _thread_kern_sig_[un]defer()'s and revision 1.18 put them back in > but left an undefer.
So I noticed. But it seems to me as if the undefers could be removed from within the if-else-blocks and collapsed into a single undefer just beneath the if-else-blocks, right before the _thread_leave_cancellation_point(); Zlo _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
