On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:03:05PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >No, we should be using the __restrict as coded. But I wonder why > >we can't just use "restrict"... > > Because that would really mess up any user program that used > 'restrict' as a variable or function name. I think the > current approach is the best.
Such code isn't portable to C99, which is still a goal of ours. I like RU's suggestion, because it is straight C[99] code and not an abstraction. I'll do a 'make world' test and see if we'd have trouble with RU's form. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
