On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I'm working on getting devd(8) usable for usb devices. > > The part I'm not sure about is where you add the pnpinfo to the > devaddq stuff. All that stuff should generally be in devaddq. Why > did you did it the way you did and what were you able to gain by it?
Fact is that we need more information then available for attach/detach statements right now to replace usbd - especially the serial number of a device was the part that I'm interested in. What still puzzles me is why pnpinfo is currently only part in case of unassigned new devices - it looks intentionaly to be left out for other cases - therefor the current patch just adds it in the most simple way to test the other part and was never intended as a commit candidate. Do you think there could be problems with pnpinfo for other type of devices (cardbus, pcmcia, acpi, ...)? -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
