Matthew Dillon wrote: > > There's no reason why the time has to be in microseconds or > even that it must be adjusted to realtime. You also do not > have to support low power modes during testing which means > that just time-stamping the packets with the TSC plus a simple > base offset to correct for variences between cpus and machines > on the network ought to be sufficient.
Fair enough. In my case I didn't need the timestamp anyway so just disabling it was the least-effort way to remove the overhead. I pointed out the timestamp issue only because it will penalize BPF against a new method (that doesn't have them) more than one might expect. -ed _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
