On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:49:04PM -0600, Kevin Lyons wrote: > I think the problem can still be fixed. Simply put in /bin/tcsh and let > /bin/csh be what it actually is, which is to say /bin/csh. I realize > that will add all of 300kB to the system. And there would also have to > be an entry for tcsh in /etc/shells. Should I send a patch? > > Developers have a right to expect a certain basic level of functionality > on a system. When he calls fopen() he should get fopen, when he calls > /bin/bash he should get /bin/bash not zsh nor sh nor ksh.
I have to agree with Kevin's sentiments on principle. 'csh' should run pure csh, not anything else. 'sh' should be pure sh, not what Linux does and bastardize it as /bin/bash If someon wants a more powerful shell, they can install it themselves. -- Avleen Vig Systems Administrator Personal: www.silverwraith.com EFnet: irc.mindspring.com (Earthlink user access only) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
