On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:53:58PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > >I'm extremely happy with having tcsh instead of csh in the base system. As > >others have said, if someone has an operational requirement for plain old > >csh, they are free to install the port and make the appropriate links. > > As an interested (and innocent) bystander, I'm not quite grasping why it's > an either/or proposition. Why not just break the link, grab net/open's > /bin/csh and commit it?
Because two copies of csh are two too many. If we were to import another shell into the base system, it would not be csh. Tim _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
