One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes
any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another
implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like
SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to
p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide
here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only
be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold
over what's currently available now.
- Jordan
On Dec 7, 2004, at 2:04 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:58:27PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Hi hackers,
I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1]
that
should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance
that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? Considering GNU's
version security track record I think it could be a good move, and it
would help testing the code in another production environment.
Have you verified that it does everything it needs to do, and works
correctly, in a FreeBSD environment? If not, that's step one.
Kris
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
