guys this is not a flame war but the linux way in arranging the source file is really better than freebsd way, it's a fact. however it's easy to rearrange it in 1 min as someone said before. but i mean this step should be done from the core team. for example all fs has to go in a subdir called fs arch specific file should go in subdir called arch/(arch name) and so on . if ls the files in freebsd sys subdir , u will got about 54 subdirs and a makefile while linux contains about 15 subdirs only.
guys, don't take my words against bsd , i admit that the performace of bsd is much better than linux and i'm planning to change to it as my primary os. but we can get the good things from linux and through out the bad ones.
Have you ever thought that time is better spent on engineering rather than silly dicussions of 'facts' like yours? I really don't give a hoot
what Linux's layout is, nor whether you think that changing FreeBSD to
be more like it is a trivial task.
Scott _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
