--- Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > An MMU-less port of any BSD would be very > worthwhile, even if it > requires a radical divergence from the original > codebase. I was
woudn''t it be rather inefficient (in the BEST case) -handling numerous memory contextx -1 per process? > hoping that such a treat would appear out of NetBSD, > but that doesn't > seem to be the case. > > Scott They have taken a conscious decision not to work in that direction -as it would screw up their overall s/w architecture in accomodating that port [if they do manage to get a non-mmu port ready]. regards -kamal > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ------------------------------------------------------------ Kamal R. Prasad UNIX systems consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is:-). ------------------------------------------------------------ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
