carrying on this discussion, what would be a good locking mechanism to use to protect tsleep() and other sensitive areas in a driver in freebsd 4.x ?
the current code for the driver in 5.x uses mtx_lock and mtx_unlock with some parts even being protected by mtx_lock(&Giant).
would the use of simple_lock() or s_lock() do, given that SIMPLELOCK_DEBUG was defined in the 4.x kernel ?
the mechanism is actually a pseudo device driver which communicates with the real device driver. the pseudo device driver creates a bunch of /dev/ devices which the userland reads/writes to, and the pseudo device driver then places data in a few buffers.
the real device driver then reads these buffers and uses busdma to send the data to the device. reading is done by using busdma to read from the device and then placing the data in these buffers for the pseudo device to return to the userland process.
locking in the real device driver uses splhigh/splx, but what locking should be used in the pseudo device driver ?
-- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." [EMAIL PROTECTED] (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
