On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:54:40PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 05:57:24AM +0900, Kazuaki Oda wrote: > > BTW do you know the reason why lock is released before calling > > objlist_call_fini()? If we don't release the lock, what problem will > > occur? deadlock? > The reasoning behind releasing the lock is to allow calls to dl*() > functions from constructors/destructors. This is common practice > and shall be supported. Yes, leaving the lock taken will lead to > deadlock.
Even worse, e.g. access to Thread Locale Storage or possible even lazily resolved symbols can result in such calls, making it completely unpredictable. > Please, try the following patch and report results. I can run (modified *) > version of your test for some time without crash with both libpthread > and libthr. I don't like this patch, give me some time to think of a better solution. Joerg _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
