Steve Kargl wrote: > > I realized this. However, the OP had 2 problems. > He had problems installing fpc because of library > issues.
No, I had a problem compiling Lazarus because of an incorrect library call in FPC. FPC installed/compiled correctly from the freepascal _sources_ (Not available via ports). What's called sources in ports is nothing more than a collection of pre-built binaries and libs. To compile Lazarus, you need FPC-2.0.2 source tree, > lang/fpc will remove those problem. Whether or not the pre-built ports FPC has the proper libs compiled in or not is meaningless, since I need a good source tree. The only way to get one of those on freebsd is to manually patch the freepascal sources. Do you know of a freebsd-patched FPC-2.0.2 source? > 2nd problem was with Lazarus. If he had a working > coherent fpc, it may be easier to build Lazarus. > He could even submit a port. > I will submit a port if I can get Lazarus to compile. What's needed to compile Lazarus is a proper 2.0.2 source tree (binaries won't do), and a Lazarus source tree which properly calls for available/proper freebsd libs. Neither of which exist AFAIK. Bob _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
