On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:46:21AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-11-02 18:34, Josh Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Can we have something that doesn't need one option letter for each > > >protocol, protocol family or socket type, please? :) > > > > I'd be willing to modify it to take a -P argument with one of: > > > > tcp > > udp > > tcp,udp > > udp,tcp > > > > If the consensus is to add -P, I'd be happy to make the changes. I > > assume without -P we'd want to show both, so perhaps udp,tcp and > > tcp,udp aren't necessary. > > Quite right. If the default is to show *both*, then we only need to > specify one of them in the -P argument. If you want, for the sake of > completeness to support the "-P proto[,proto]" syntax too, that's also > fine, I guess :)
We're getting SCTP support RSN so that's probably a good idea... -- Brooks
pgp1uQLOdpvfX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
