In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Mounting a second devfs instance is undesirable for a number of
: reasons, not least that you end up with an extra file system
: floating around (although not reachable via the name space). It's
: certainly not disastrous though.
At work, we have a build server. Our build environment is a chroot'd
area that allows us to insultate the products we're building from the
host os's files completely. We have to have a devfs entry in each of
these chroots. We often see dozens of devfs instances mounted on our
6.2 build boxes w/o ill effect. We've done this as far back as 5.3.
Warner
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"