[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Coleman Kane wrote: > >> On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Quoting Olivier Warin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007 >>> 19:54:09 +0100): >>> >>> > This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port >>> takes >>> > far too long now... and make index each time I upgrade my ports is >>> > awfull too. >>> >>> Regarding "make index": try "make fetchindex" right after the cvsup. >>> IT may not be up to the point with the cvsupped stuff, but not far off. >>> >>> Bye, >>> Alexander. >> >> >> >> I don't think we who use the modular X.org tree can do this since a >> number >> of the ports won't be properly registered in the file (or am I off-base >> here?). >> -- >> Coleman > > Heh, that is a serious problem considering that modular Xorg would > probably at max add about 100 ~ 150~some packages to the portage tree, > depending on how things are done.
Yeah, I propose we just stay with X.org 6.9.0. PS: This is "ports tree" really, not "portage tree". -- Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
