hi
when looking at PR103455 I found this and I have a question..
code:
swp_pager_strategy(bp);
/*
* wait for the page we want to complete. VPO_SWAPINPROG is always
* cleared on completion. If an I/O error occurs, SWAPBLK_NONE
* is set in the meta-data.
*/
VM_OBJECT_LOCK(object);
while ((mreq->oflags & VPO_SWAPINPROG) != 0) {
mreq->oflags |= VPO_WANTED;
vm_page_lock_queues();
vm_page_flag_set(mreq, PG_REFERENCED);
vm_page_unlock_queues();
cnt.v_intrans++;
if (msleep(mreq, VM_OBJECT_MTX(object), PSWP, "swread", hz*20))
{
the swp_pager_strategy() initiates IO (which should issue the wakeup() necessary
for the msleep()). the problem in the PR is that the msleep() is never (within
the
specified 20 seconds) woken up. I wonder if this is because the wakeup arrives
BEFORE
the actual msleep() is issued. the page queue locking can take some time so
there
is a space for a missed wakeup.
is my analysis correct? if so, can the race be mitigated by moving the flag
setting (hence
also the locking) after the msleep()?
thnx
roman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
