Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2008-02-23 16:48, "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This knee-jerk reaction against gnu find functionality baffles me.
The changes are trivial and make FreeBSD more compatible. It is such
an obvious no-brainer that I frankly didn't expect anybody to bat an
eye.
So should I expect similar knee-jerk reactions to the just committed
`finger compatibility' option to implement du -l for hardlinks?
FWIW, a vote in favour of compatibility shims.
It's just a shame that this won't cut both ways - it would be nice, for
example, if Linux find would implement proper units to -atime etc. The
FreeBSD syntax of -atime +12h is so much nicer than -amin +720. Ah
well, can but dream...
--Alex
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
