On 2008-03-04 21:01, Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 17:01:28 Mar 04, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> I did this a while ago when porting some of our code to Linux because it >> builds with pmake.. >> >> Your patches are much nicer than mine however :) >> >> The tailq stuff could be shoved into a linux.h or some such.. So it's >> more obvious what it's for and why it's there. >> > > PMI but why do I see tailq in gentoo? > > I was taken by surprise when I found my code compile and run beautifully > few months ago. > > I am wondering if that is the case, then why port it?
Minor compatibility nits here and there, which can turn a simple TAILQ_FOREACH() call to a nightmare of nested preprocessor hells :) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
