On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 07:23:52PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hello Stefan, > > (CC'ing this back to the list) > > * Stefan Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this is great news! Can you provide your patches to upgrade the port > > to 2.3-pre? > > I could, but I patched the ports rather poorly. The plists are > incorrect. I just incremented the version numbers, updated the distinfo > and made some changes to the llvm-gcc4 port to use the proper wrksrc.
I've got WIP updates of both ports, but probably won't get them committed until next week. > > If 2.3-pre allows the kernel to boot and run, then many user-land > > programs should work as well. Testing a make world (and preparing > > the infrastructure to support llvm in addition to gcc and icc might > > be worthwhile ...). > > We should really try that. Unfortunately I'm quite busy, hacking on the > TTY layer. ;-) > > > You probably know about the clang project, which tries to completely > > replace the gcc parts needed for llvm-gcc ... > > Yes. I haven't looked at it yet. It doesn't seem to be in Ports yet. Any > takers? ;-) Unless you make an evil port that does a checkout of last nights sources from svn, there isn't much point today. Chris Latner said it would probably be ready to start publishing snapshots in 3-6 months (i.e. llvm 2.4 or 2.5). I'd like to whip one up, but haven't yet. -- Brooks
pgpQz5KAbXCHU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
