On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 13:50:17 -0400 "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I did mention in my introduction that I was aware of this history > (including > > that web page). I brought this up again because it hadn't seen daylight > in > > quite some time. The Wiki page seems to say that it was updated about a > > month ago. Without figuring how to pull the wiki's version history, I > don't > > see significant change. Of note, the last conversation the wiki > references > > is 8 months old. > > Um, how do you figure last conversation with wiki references is 8 > months old? It got brought up in a converation on -hackers just last > month: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-June/024956.html > While I don't follow freebsd-chat with any regularity, My point was that the wiki didn't reverence any conversations newer than 8 months old still stands. That conversation is not referenced by the wiki. It may be an example of someone bringing up the question without doing research, but that is not the case here, either. > In particular, none of these activities seem to pop up in the regular > > FreeBSD Project status reports. > > None of them are important enough to warrant it. On that, you and I differ. Aside from nvidia requesting them, the 5 points all seem very relevant to 64-bit systems in general. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
