On 2008-Aug-23 22:40:55 -0500, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >My understanding is the the port is in a pre-alpha state due to unfinished >work in the kernel, so expecting there to be any userbase is premature.
Except that the wiki gives a far more optimistic picture. >All of our 'new' architectures which are in this state have so few non- >developer users that there is hardly any reason to submit PRs. AFAICT >the active developers already know what's missing :-) That makes it very difficult for someone outside that group to come up to speed. I can't find anything in the freebsd-sun4v archvies. I was hoping that there would be a list somewhere of what state various subsystems were in and what remained to be done. wiki.freebsd.org sounds like the ideal place for this. On 2008-Aug-23 20:39:29 -0700, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Maybe some time should be spent looking at stuff from NetBSD to see >whether or not they've solved some already critical porting pieces >that FreeBSD lacks in this architecture? I can't find anything that suggests NetBSD runs on sun4v. Their sparc64 port only covers the US-I/II families and there's no mention of sun4v. -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
pgp5YmG2dn3qK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
