I don't understand. If it was not broken, then why did it change in later FreeBSD versions?
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 07:41:14AM -0400, Barry Andrews wrote: > > Do you know if this is documented in Release Notes or Known Issues or > > somewhere? > > Why would it be an "issue"? gcc -pthread and libpthread linking is > documented pretty much everywhere on the web. There isn't anything > broken about it, it's how it's done on older FreeBSD. > > Note that all of this has significantly changed in later FreeBSD > versions, and that the 5.x series was deprecated a very long time ago. > > >> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Barry Andrews wrote: > >> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> I have a multi-threaded library that is linked against libpthread. > >>> When I > >>> load this lib into a tclsh process on FreeBSD, I get this error, > >>> "Recurse on > >>> private mutex". and crash. I understand that I can have this issue > >>> when the > >>> executable is not linked against libpthread but one of the loaded > >>> libs is. > >>> Basically, it thinks it's in single threaded mode. > >> > >> This must be an older version of FreeBSD. I think you must > >> link your application (tclsh or whatever) against libpthread > >> in order for this to work. The libc functions won't get properly > >> overloaded by their equivalents in libpthread unless you do > >> this. > > -- > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
