M. Warner Losh wrote: [...] (about return ();)
It has been an example used for the past 15 years at least as to why to do this... I don't know how many people have actually used the ability to do this in code.
I have done so..
: Also I consider this as gross abuse: Macro names shall be in all : uppercase, so it is clear that there is a macro at work. Therefore : "return" is not a candidate. So this would violate yet another rule in : style(9) (the original return already violates the no-redundant : parentheses rule). : Also I would not mention __func__: there were objections against using : it in the past (though I, logically, prefer its use).It is a debugging aid, but one of dubious value for a far more fundamental reason: return; will break any macro. Warner _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
