-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 21 May 2009 17:44:42 +0100 [email protected] mentioned:
> On 2009-05-21 16:10:18, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > You can also try using devel/cross-binutils to build cross-tools for > > x86_64-freebsd. Random people reported they're working fine. > > Unfortunately, as noted in this thread: > > http://marc.info/?l=freebsd-hackers&m=124146166902690&w=2 > > Using that port works but creates a compiler that emits code > that can't be assembled by the default system binutils. Not > great for a port... > Why not make this compiler to use fresh binutils from cross-binutils instead of using systems binutils? This will also allow to support newer processor families and architectures. Is it possible to tell GNAT where to look for binutils to assembly and link with? - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkoV22IACgkQK/VZk+smlYGJSACghXD2H4iN9HE/DmNDKhdNVfMY /SQAnjQ+HMeyMP9ZKJhF5F09Buex1tOz =VB1I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:4a15db3c994295534499307! _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
