On Tuesday 05 January 2010 9:17:22 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:59:13PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote: > >> > >>> Attached patch is against head; for the above, I had patched stable/7. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >> > >> INSTKERNNAME rather than INSTALLKERNEL? > > > > Well, I was interested in knowing which config was being used, not so > > much what the name of the subdirectory in /boot was going to be. > > > > (Default value for INSTKERNNAME is "kernel", which isn't something I > > find useful to report.) > > Woopps. Cache-corruption;-) The original one is fine then.
Or maybe 'Installing INSTALLKERNEL as INSTKERNNAME'. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
