> > Precisely. However, speed of the crypto engine should be directly > > proportional to a peak speed of the RNG, > > That statement makes no sense to me. Why would the RNG be relevant > after the session keys are established?
okay, so I was wrong sure way to quickly find out if your idea is wrong: say it on a maillist :) (I thought for some reason that new random string needs to be generated for every block that's being encrypted) > I don't really care how fast the crypto engine is on my Via system. neither do I care how fast it is on someone else's system :p, but I'm just curious whether the speed VIA claims, 25Gbps(!) peak is achievable > I just care that it offloads the ALU. I haven't gotten around to > proving whether (and by how much) it does so. did you get to the point that you're sure it's being used? > > BTW... `ubench`? :) > > Not impressive. you're using the same board as OP? [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
