On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:42:28 +1300 "Daniel Kerse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List > > Please CC me in on any replies, I do not currently subscribe to this > list. > > I have a 64MB PCI graphics card[1] and the performance leaves much to > be desired[2]. I was hoping someone could point me in the right > direction towards improving this. I am currently using the nvidia [...] > 1942 frames in 5.0 seconds = 388.394 FPS > 1988 frames in 5.0 seconds = 397.518 FPS > 1981 frames in 5.0 seconds = 396.184 FPS > 1920 frames in 5.0 seconds = 383.497 FPS > 1685 frames in 5.1 seconds = 331.403 FPS > 2030 frames in 5.0 seconds = 405.954 FPS > 2754 frames in 5.0 seconds = 550.727 FPS > 3410 frames in 5.0 seconds = 681.929 FPS > 4738 frames in 5.1 seconds = 936.760 FPS > 4838 frames in 5.0 seconds = 967.508 FPS > 4780 frames in 5.0 seconds = 955.983 FPS > 4891 frames in 5.0 seconds = 977.145 FPS and you call this poor performance?! For comparison, my Matrox G550 does ~250-300 fps. Make sure to run glxgears when the system is idle, though, because these figures aren't very useful (differ by factor >3). Why do you need high performance anyway? Even with my card, there's no lag runnig 'k3dsurf' full-screen in OpenGL mode, for example. As for games, there's few for FBSD, and your card should do fine [sadly, the only graphics-intensive simulator -- FlightGear -- has been always broken on FreeBSD for me; these days it doesn't crash, but the frame rate is still much to be desired (far less than 1) Totally useless :(] [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
