I have had good success with nforce boards with release-7.0
sataII seems to work well.
Dean
Danny Carroll wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking to set up a file server at our office. It's a small office
so price is a concern. Performance is also going to be important.
The data will be replicated from another site so integrity of the data
is not paramount. For this reason I think I'll be able to run with ZFS.
I see it as a good opportunity to contribute to getting ZFS stable and
non-experimental.
What I am really concerned about is the SATA support.
If I look at AMD64 as an arch, does anyone have any experience with good
IO chipsets that can do full SATA-300?
I don't mind if it is a on-board or if I get a good controller card so
long as I can get decent performance out of the Seagate Barracuda
7200.11 drives.
I'd be willing to go with intel arch although from a ZFS perspective it
sounds like AMD64 is better.
-D
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
http://fragfest.com.au
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
