Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >> Luigi Rizzo wrote: >>> i am basically ok with this except, as i said, that there is >>> no point in replicating the interface name i.e. why re0-re5 >>> instead of just re0-5 ? you just open up to possible mistakes >>> and the need for extra code to check what happens when the user >>> types re2-de5 (by mistake or intentionally). >> Ok, it's just syntactic sugar anyway which doesn't really affect >> implimentation anyway. >> >> So, to recap. You will be fine with although I'm now leaning toward >> "factor" in stead of "delta" but that will be a trivial change and >> I'd like to change "@" to "indirect". >> >> skipto @ via vlan2-264 base 100 delta 100 >> >> or as I'd prefer >> >> skipto indirect via vlan2-264 base 100 factor 100 > > either way is fine with me. >
How about; skipto 1000:1000 via vlan2-264 ?? -- Sten Daniel Sørsdal _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
