On Monday 07 May 2007 21:02:56 Julian Elischer wrote: > Kirk Davis wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> in -current you can implement a routing table via FWD and tables. > >> in 6.x you need to specify the next hop. and an more explicit rule. > > > > Is there any information floating around on how to do this in current > > using the FWD rules and tables? Any pointer on where to look. > > man ipfw on -current > > basically you can implement alternate routing tables.. > > ipfw table 1 add 0.0.0.0/0 4.5.6.7 # default route for table 1 > ipfw table 1 add 2.3.4.0/24 5.4.3.2 # but not for packets to 2.3.4.x > ipfw table 2 add 0.0.0.0/0 7.6.5.4 #default route for table 2 > ipfw table 2 add 2.3.4.0/24 6.5.4.3 # but differnet route for packets to > 2.3.4.x >
certainly this still are not routing tables but simplified forward table configurations right? what we still need is kind of route2 implementation like Linux does Joao A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
