On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pawel Tyll <[email protected]> wrote: > One more question tough, > > I have 4 identical machines, also with em-driven NICs - yet this is > the only one that dies like this. OTOH Other machines don't do traffic > shaping and do not use ipfw that extensively. Does this match your > theory?
It's likely that the mbuf handling problem (in em_refresh_mbufs()) is triggered by the processing you're doing with ipfw (or elsewhere for that matter), so, yes, I think it's a bug fixed in the revision discussed. When you update and test, please let us know. Also, don't forget to submit a follow-up to your PR. Thanks! -Brandon _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
