On 2/4/11 8:30 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/128260; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Scheidell<[email protected]>
To:<[email protected]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/128260: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw_divert damages IPv6 packets
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:21:16 -0500
since the last ipv4 block was released yesterday, how about a 'ping' for
getting ipv6 working in ipfw_divert?
"oh, allright...."
(since I did the original divert I guess it's a reasonable cause...)
:-)
I guess I need to learn that IPV6 stuff some time.
an example: snort with inline, and/or snort 2.9.0 with daq and inline.
snort (by itself) is fully ipv6 ready, with a cravat about ipv6 and ipfw.
so, ping!
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
