On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Özkan KIRIK <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Andreas Nilsson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Özkan KIRIK <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm using kernel FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #2 r257635 kernel. >>> I am trying to add port number to ipfw tables. But there is something >>> strange : >>> Problem is easily repeatable. >>> >>> #ipfw table 1 flush >>> #ipfw table 1 add 4899 >>> #ipfw table 1 list >>> ::/0 0 >>> >> Works with ipfw table 1 add 0 4899 >> > No, i want to use this table as port list ( to use with "lookup src-port > 1" ) . If you add like this, you cannot match against ports. Am I wrong? > No, that should be possible. > > >> >>> #ipfw table 1 flush >>> #ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 ( not 10.0.0.1, the last 1 has 0 as >>> prefix ) >>> #ipfw table 1 list >>> ::/0 0 >>> >> Did you mean ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.0 1 ? That works for me. >> > Please dont leave spaces between 0 and 1. > Ok. any specific reason to type it as 10.2.3.01 instead 0f 10.2.3.1 ? > > >> >>> #ipfw table 1 delete ::/0 >>> ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_TABLE_XDEL): No such process >>> >> However ipfw table 1 delete 0.0.0.0/0 does. >> > Thank you > >> >>> >>> I guess that, this problem is related to radix mask calculation >>> problem/fix. >>> >>> Is there a quick solution for this. >>> Best, regards, >> >> >> Best regards >> Andreas >> > > Best regards, > Ozkan. > > Best regards Andreas _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
