03.08.2015, 22:57, "Julian Elischer" <jul...@freebsd.org>:
> On 8/3/15 10:50 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>  03.08.2015, 17:14, "Ian Smith" <smi...@nimnet.asn.au>:
>>>  On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>>    > my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't
>>>    > work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug),
>>>    > Now I see that its just 'not supported'
>>  I implemented the kernel range deletion, but converted userland part as-is.
>>  Should work on HEAD now (r286232).
>
> great!
> Pitty I'm stuck working on 8.0 :-) maybe I can back-port it.
Well, I'm afraid you will have to do it in a slightly different way since there 
was no "ranged delele" support in kernel (so you would probably need to fetch 
the ruleset and delete matching rules one-by-one).
>
>>>    >
>>>    > It may be my imagination but (distant) past?
>>>
>>>  I was surprised too; ISTR having used that before too, but I may
>>>  misremember remembering ..
>>  I also had a feeling that this syntax should work (maybe because it 
>> silently accepted "ranged" queries) but I couldn't find any presence of real 
>> ranged deletion support in SVN.
>>>  On 9.3 with rules 100-1000 in 100's, 'ipfw delete 600-800' deletes only
>>>  600 .. without complaint, returning 0 if 600 existed. NG for scripts.
>>>
>>>  cheers, Ian
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
>>>  To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
>>  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
>>  To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to