It is more and more complex here! On 8 June 2016 at 17:28, Jan Bramkamp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/06/16 10:00, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > >> On 07.06.16 09:31, wishmaster wrote: >> >>> With the following patch you will be able create two different states, I >>>> think, and solve your task with NAT and dynamic rules: >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6674 >>>> >>> >>> Will there be the patch in the 11-RELEASE? >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> there are three patches for ipfw, that I want to commit: >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6420 >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6434 >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6674 >> >> But we are in code slush and there aren't any positive review yet. So, I >> guess they will be committed only after 11.0 would be branched. >> > > To bad. Those all look very useful and and together would enable me to use > my FreeBSD jail hosts for all packet filtering instead of running the > traffic through a OpenBSD bhyve guest on each jail host. > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
