On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote:

Hi,

Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new
functionality?

The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the
latter.

Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and
breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail.

This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use
single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the
output format.

/bz

PS: I trimmed the CC: list as noone was able to adhere to Reply-To.

--
Bjoern A. Zeeb                      The greatest risk is not taking one.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to