On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 09:14:23PM +0200, Dirk Engling wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013, Jamie Gritton wrote: > > > If you don't mind some slightly difficult error messages, you can always > > "disable" a jail with exec.prestart="false". jail(8) requires all > > commands to succeed, and in particular won't even create a jail when one > > of the prestart commands fails. > > This violates POLA, but failing with > > exec.prestart="echo skipping jail; exit 1" > > might work. Even though this is not a good marker from a scripting > perspective.
Will this prevent all preparations from happening, i.e. will filesystems be mounted for jails disabled this way? Although this may work, I think that this looks dirty. I'd really prefer a "disabled" or "noauto" keyword instead. -- Paul Schenkeveld _______________________________________________ freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
