Hi Luke,
Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:03:32 +0000 - Luke Crooks <[email protected]>: > Hi Ole, > > I am by no means an expert, but to me I see your problem is here.. > > > # ezjail-admin create somejail 'lo1|b.b.b.238,lo1|127.b.b.238' > > You are binding the jail to the same network controller lo1. > > Usually you would bind the jail like.. > > # ezjail-admin create somejail 'lo1|127.0.0.238, emX|10.1.1.238' If I do this (and ad first I tried exactly this) the networking on the host system will fail a few minutes after the jail start. And I have no remote connection to the Server. So I only can do a hard reset. I don't know why this happens. At the moment I only have production Servers in this datacenter, so I can't play with them to reproduce. But I will organize another and report here. Usually I have Servers with a public IP in a /24 Layer2 network. Then # ezjail-admin create somejail 'lo1|127.b.b.238, emX|b.b.b.238' woks fine. > Where 10.1.1.0/24 is your subnet of your host. And you have free > range on the network and want to create the jail as a fully fledged > host. > > Seeing as you have only been assigned a /32 for your host. I would > imagine you would either need to possibly do something like... > > # ezjail-admin create somejail 'lo1|127.0.0.238, lo0|127. 0.0.237' > > E.g bind the jail loopback of lo1 to the host loopback lo0. But I have > never seen a configuration like yours using the same device twice, > but I could be totally wrong. But then I also have to set a static route like # route add b.b.b.238 127. 0.0.237 to reach the server with the public IP? Thank you all for your replies Ole
pgpZkC8CDT2Xk.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
