On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, Doug Rabson wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 at 16:54, James Gritton <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2025-07-14 03:53, Doug Rabson wrote:

I tried setting allow.socket_af for a jail which inherits the host vnet
and this still has problems creating interfaces:

$ jid=$(sudo jail -i -c host.hostname=foo vnet=inherit allow.socket_af
path=/ persist)
$ sudo jexec $jid
You have mail.
root@foo:/ # ifconfig bridge create
ifconfig: socket(family 2,SOCK_DGRAM): Protocol not supported
root@foo:/ # exit
exit
$ sudo jail -r $jid


I think I see the problem: address family 2 is AF_INET, which
check_prison_af will only disallow if IPv4 is disabled in that jail - which
it is!  add ip4=inherit to your child jail and see if that does the trick.

A typical non-vnet jail has one or more IP address included in the
definition, but without that the default is ip4=disabled.  Bjoern's "all I
have is yours" is not in fact the overriding jail philosophy, but rather
"you get only what you ask for."


Jamie is, of course, correct and setting ip4=inherit fixes
the EPROTONOSUPPORT, uncovering my original EPERM problem:

$ jid=$(sudo jail -i -c host.hostname=foo ip4=inherit allow.socket_af
path=/ persist)
$ sudo jexec $jid ifconfig bridge create
ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE2 (bridge): Operation not permitted

And I assume that now is because vnet=inherit does not set PR_VNET and
prison_priv_check() now does not catch:

   3912         /*
   3913          * No default: or deny here.
   3914          * In case of no permit fall through to next switch().
   3915          */
   3916                 if (cred->cr_prison->pr_flags & PR_VNET)
   3917                         return (0);

and so you run into the default at the end.  Wild guess.

I think we really need a flag if we want to allow "vnet=inherit" and
"give me power to mangle with my parent's vnet".  *sigh*.

Jamie? Help?

--
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                                     r15:7

Reply via email to